|
Rebuilding Our Urban Heritage
Issue 38 - Feb 08
In Asia's rapidly
developing cities, high
land values mean
that the development
potential of a given site
inevitably dwarves the
value of any existing
structures. Accordingly,
urban redevelopment has
become a byword for the
destruction of the old. But
does the conservation of
urban heritage really have
to fall a distant second
to the achievement of
economic value?
A well conceived, designed and implemented
redevelopment can preserve history, rejuvenate an
entire district and achieve financial goals for the parties
involved. Yet urban renewal projects across the region
have often fallen short of achieving the correct balance
between the conservation of heritage and the realisation
of profit. In some cases, such as the imminent demise of
Beijing's Hutongs and the swiftly disappearing vestiges
of Hong Kong's colonial and traditional past, it seems
that conservation is seem as merely an impediment to
progress, and a barrier to value creation.
All is not lost however. Government authorities,
developers and end-use occupiers alike are beginning
to wake up to the idea that the destruction of heritage
is a zero sum game. While one party may benefit today,
eventually all parties will pay. A number of successful
projects across the region are also showcasing how,
with the right approach to planning and design, there
is significant value to be created in an approach that
creates something new out of something old.
Role of Planning
Planning is good for redevelopment, it's complimentary,"
says Zhu Jieming, Associate Professor, Urban Planning & Management Research Group Leader, National University
of Singapore. Theoretically speaking, he explains,
planning is simply a public control of land usage. In
practice however, the situation is much more complex,
with public and private interests often intersecting or
even at odds with each other.
Planning, however, should never be seen as merely
serving one side over the other in the public-private
debate. "Sometimes developers complain that planning
regulations are too strict, too inflexible, but they are
wrong," insists Zhu. He explains the role of planning in
creating a good urban renewal project. Firstly planning
can prevent incompatible land uses adjacent to each
other, removing the risk of a paper mill being built next to
a five star hotel. Planning can also ensure the provision of
public amenities, such as greenery and open space These
are often things that a private developer may not beinterested in supplying but which are crucial for a good
public area.
Good planning should also include some form public
investment. Redevelopment of existing buildings and
infrastructure can be too costly for private developers to
realise a reasonable profit. Also, concludes Zhu, room
should be allowed for market driven initiatives, to allow
for the meeting corporate as well as public needs.
|

Sometimes developers complain that planning regulations are too strict, too inflexible, but they are wrong.
|
|
Designing Heritage
According to Dr. Peter Cookson Smith, Director, Urbis
Limited, "Good urban regeneration generally requires
two things, the ability to look at the exercise in terms of
not merely the physical outcome but in social, economic
and environmental terms, as well as recognising local
heritage and conservation." He cites a number of
excellent examples of successful projects from around
Asia.
As an urban planner, Cookson Smith is keen to
differentiate between renewal, regeneration and
redevelopment. "Renewal is very simplistic," he says, "It
goes on all the time and happens when the value of the
land exceeds what is sitting on that land. Regeneration
is really something else, closely related to conservation
but also to what is essentially an approach that brings
together facets of social and community, economics
environment and physical development." Redevelopment,
on the other hand, is generally a large scale developer
driven process where community voices are not heard.
"Participation is successful when you work with the
community and when you have a properly put together,
long term process with an identifiable community. The
problem is older established communities are generally
the technically poorer areas in Asian cities and the whole
urban design is geared around informality, mix of uses,
street interest. This makes the conservation of heritage
difficult," says Cookson Smith.
Valuing Heritage
From the financial perspective, explains Kam-hung Yu,Senior Managing Director, Hong Kong, Southern China and Taiwan, CBRE and President of The Hong Kong Institute of Surveyors, the same theory of economic value applies to heritage sites as to any other. "Economic value can be priced. You can do a cost benefit analysis Commercial development, the future economic activities from the assigned land use, you can make a land valuation to an actual dollar amount.
With heritage sites, the supply side is reduced. However, depending on usage restrictions the demand side may also be affected. In order to value these types of sites, Yu explains: "You need to set the parameters. What are the existing restrictions, the future restrictions? What is the development density? Are there design restrictions, is there flexibility of uses? Can site be changed into restaurants or do we need to maintain it as government house, can we add something there? There are many, many different parameters."
Once these parameters have been ascertained, a demand and supply curve can be calculated and a price assigned accordingly. It is here, Yu continues, that un-priced economic criteria come into play. "Things like air quality, blue sky, and collective memory. How you compare these to the priced value is a matter of judgment. It's not a science, it's an art," he says. The issue of collective memory, and its association with the urban built environment has become a key issue in the debate. However, the impact of this concept and how it should affect urban redevelopment is not yet decided.
It seems like the art of redrawing our urban landscapes is currently producing mixed results. Speaking at an exhibition by the Singapore Urban Renewal Authority in November 2007, Grace Fu, Minster of State for National Development described a more enlightened approach to redevelopment and conservation, one that sets a high bar for governments across the region. "We need to take into account economic opportunities and social demographic trends in balancing our land use needs with the preservation of our legacy. This is a key long-term challenge for all of us from the private, public and people sectors." RFP
|
Renewal is very simplistic, regeneration is really something else, closely related to conservation.
Things like
air quality, blue sky, and
collective memory. How
you compare
these to the priced value
is a matter of
judgment. It's
not a science,
it's an art
|