|
2007 in Perspective
In the concluding part of our series, we look at landmark legal changes in 2007 in Vietnam and China.
Issue 39 - Mar 08
Vietnam
Vietnam's 11 January 2007 accession to the World
Trade Organization ushered in the country's most
dynamic year of growth in living memory. Double digit
increases in exports, tourist arrivals, manufacturing and
services, coupled with unprecedented inflows of foreign
capital into the country's newly opened securities
markets, have sent rents for office space and industrial
land on a rapid and sustained rise, with infrastructure
struggling to keep up.
For the most part, Vietnam's commitments to the
WTO do not directly impact on real estate, facilities
and projects. But the WTO accession is part of a
larger reform program in Vietnam that includes the
introduction of greater market forces into the land
and infrastructure sectors. Moreover, the market
access commitments Vietnam has undertaken to
liberalize trade in goods and services are unleashing
new competition and investment that has stimulated
demand. Finally, there are important undertakings in
the WTO commitments that will play a role in how the
market continues to open up.
First, some of the so-called "WTO-plus" commitments
that Vietnam undertook to gain accession into the
WTO involve allowing foreign investors to participate
in Vietnamese companies, including private and Stateowned
companies that are involved in property and
infrastructure development. These commitments are
spelled out in the 528 paragraphs of the Working Party
Report that sets out the context for Vietnam's accession
to the WTO. Among other things, Vietnam undertook
in this document to allow foreign equity participation
in local enterprises involved in real estate and property
development, as well as infrastructure development,
subject to some limitations in terms of lines of business
that are considered prohibited, restricted or conditional.
Many of these commitments have already been implemented, first by a substantially amended
Enterprise Law, which unified the old, separate legal
regimes for foreign and direct investment in 2006, and
the Investment Law, which provides specifically for
large scale infrastructure projects and their approval
processes. Further reforms to the Land Law and its
implementing decrees have enabled foreign developers
to sell property interests to Vietnamese citizens and
certain long-term leasehold rights to foreigners resident
in Vietnam. On the other hand, a new Personal Income
Tax Law will take effect that imposes for the first
time a capital gains tax on gains of individuals from
property sales (formerly such gains were only taxable to
enterprises).
Secondly, demand for international standard office and
residential space has been stimulated by the market
access reforms Vietnam is introducing in accordance
with the WTO Working Party Report's Schedule on
Services. Vietnam is opening its doors to foreign
architectural and construction firms, financial service
providers, IT firms, telcos, travel service providers and
a long list of other service providers and, especially
combined with a growing domestic tenant market, this
is stimulating demand for high quality office space.
On the other hand, current developers are concerned
that ongoing restrictions on foreign ownership of
retail establishments, which is limited beyond the first
establishment by an "Economic Needs Test", will hinder
demand for the many retail complexes currently in the
approval and implementation process.
Contributed by:
Fred Burke, Managing Partner, Baker & McKenzie LLP, Vietnam
|
|
China
Circular on the Promotion of Efficient and
Concentrated Land Use
The incredible growth and prosperity of the People's
Republic of China (PRC)'s economy has attracted enormous amounts of capital from both local and
overseas investors. The side effect of this phenomenal
growth is the danger of inflation. The PRC government
has been trying to tackle this problem, particularly in
relation to the over-heating of the property market.
Over the past 18 months, PRC ministries and regulators
sought to tighten control over and cool down land
grants and real estate development by issuing or
increasing enforcement of a variety of regulations. The
State Council (China's highest legislative authority after
the National People's Congress) has recently weighed
in to reinforce this message through its Circular on
the Promotion of Efficient and Concentrated Land Use
issued on 3 January 2008.
This circular re-emphasised the existing control
measures and introduced new ones, covering a wide
range of issues from the clean-up of idle land; efficient
land planning and; real estate financing; to government
performance reviews. Some of the more important
changes are:
. Introduction of an additional land grant fee reflecting
land value appreciation on the grant or transfer of
idle land;
. Prohibition on financial institutions providing loans or
pre-IPO financing of projects involving illegal land use
with the implication that bank managers may be held
personally liable for any breach;
. Setting up of a new index to reflect the relationship
between consumption of construction land and
changes in GDP and fixed asset investments as a
benchmark for the performance of the government at
all levels;
. Re-emphasising existing restrictions and measures
such as the existing idle fee" of 20 percent;
suspension of land supply for villa developments; and
a ban on issuing land use rights certificate prior to the
land grant fee being paid in full.
What impact these measures have on the PRC real
estate market remains to be seen. The additional land
grant fee for land appreciation, when combined with
the existing idle land fee may significantly burden PRC
developers and impact on the existing land reserve
mechanism. The new index may also have a significant
impact on the approach of local government approach
towards real estate development since local authorities
have in the past few years generally favoured real
estate development in order to boost GDP growth.
Whilst it is unclear when and how these new measures will be implemented at the
local level, this circular urges all provinces to report on their progress in the cleaning
up of their idle land before June 2008 and it is expected local authorities will take
initiatives to comply.
Contributed by:
Real Estate Practice, Allen & Overy
China
Investment Regulations
Anyone taking an interest in the PRC property sector will be well aware that in recent
times Government has become concerned about investment in real estate. Recently
introduced Notices 171, 50 and 130 have resulted in new regulations and restrictions.
The basic position under the law is that any foreign-invested property project should
be established based on the approval of the National Development Reform Committee
and Ministry of Commerce. The correct approach as required by law is for a foreign
investor to participate in a property project through the formation of a special property
owning joint venture or wholly foreign owned enterprise (WFOE).
Foreign investors have responded by using a variety of investment structures, some of
which have involved funds entering China through a chain of business entities (often
based in secondary cities) which appear to be unconnected with the ultimate intended
investment into domestic real estate projects.
Legal concerns
It is important for foreign investors to be aware of the risks that are often involved
with structures that are not fully compliant. Notice 50 expressly prohibited any foreign
investor from evading foreign investment examination and approval procedures by
means of indirectly controlling a domestic real estate enterprise.
There could potentially be other complications resulting from the Regulations on
Merger of Domestic Enterprises with Foreign Investors which was introduced in August
2006 and included provisions regarding the indirect investment by foreign investors in
domestic enterprises without correct approvals.
Foreign exchange
The State Administration of Foreign Exchange ("SAFE") is now required to prevent
the contribution of capital by foreign investors into property projects without Ministry
of Commerce registration. In June 2007, SAFE penalised 29 banks and financial
institutions (some of them foreign) for illegal activity in various transactions including a
number involving real estate deals.
It needs to be remembered that in its commitment to the World Trade Organization
China has agreed to permit foreign investment in the property sector. Further regulation
cannot however, be ruled out although it is necessary to adapt to change and to
react to restrictions imposed by government, careful risk analysis and legal advice is
important.
Contributed by:
Ian Lewis, Partner, Mayer Brown JSM
|
Contributed by:
Barbara Li, Associate, Baker & McKenzie.
This is an edited version of an article which originally appeared in Baker & McKenzie's PRC / Vietnam Projects & Construction Newsletter. |