RFP Magazine RFP Magazine in English RFP Magazine in Chinese RSS
LEGALITIES  
   
Home Breaking News Real Estate Facilities Projects Legalities Interview Events Careers Facility Media Conference
About Us Advertise Subscribe Directory Contact Us Forum Resources Sitemap  
Branding & Marketing
Building Technology
Career Development
Design
Environment
Energy
Financing & Budgeting
Health & Safety
hospitality
Human Capital
Investment
IT & Data Centers
Project Management
Retail
Security
Workplace Solutions
 
 
 
 
LEGALITIES
Contact the editor Print this article Email this article
     

2007 in Perspective
In the concluding part of our series, we look at landmark legal changes in 2007 in Vietnam and China.
Issue 39 - Mar 08

Vietnam
Vietnam's 11 January 2007 accession to the World Trade Organization ushered in the country's most dynamic year of growth in living memory. Double digit increases in exports, tourist arrivals, manufacturing and services, coupled with unprecedented inflows of foreign capital into the country's newly opened securities markets, have sent rents for office space and industrial land on a rapid and sustained rise, with infrastructure struggling to keep up.

For the most part, Vietnam's commitments to the WTO do not directly impact on real estate, facilities and projects. But the WTO accession is part of a larger reform program in Vietnam that includes the introduction of greater market forces into the land and infrastructure sectors. Moreover, the market access commitments Vietnam has undertaken to liberalize trade in goods and services are unleashing new competition and investment that has stimulated demand. Finally, there are important undertakings in the WTO commitments that will play a role in how the market continues to open up.

First, some of the so-called "WTO-plus" commitments that Vietnam undertook to gain accession into the WTO involve allowing foreign investors to participate in Vietnamese companies, including private and Stateowned companies that are involved in property and infrastructure development. These commitments are spelled out in the 528 paragraphs of the Working Party Report that sets out the context for Vietnam's accession to the WTO. Among other things, Vietnam undertook in this document to allow foreign equity participation in local enterprises involved in real estate and property development, as well as infrastructure development, subject to some limitations in terms of lines of business that are considered prohibited, restricted or conditional.

Many of these commitments have already been implemented, first by a substantially amended Enterprise Law, which unified the old, separate legal regimes for foreign and direct investment in 2006, and the Investment Law, which provides specifically for large scale infrastructure projects and their approval processes. Further reforms to the Land Law and its implementing decrees have enabled foreign developers to sell property interests to Vietnamese citizens and certain long-term leasehold rights to foreigners resident in Vietnam. On the other hand, a new Personal Income Tax Law will take effect that imposes for the first time a capital gains tax on gains of individuals from property sales (formerly such gains were only taxable to enterprises).

Secondly, demand for international standard office and residential space has been stimulated by the market access reforms Vietnam is introducing in accordance with the WTO Working Party Report's Schedule on Services. Vietnam is opening its doors to foreign architectural and construction firms, financial service providers, IT firms, telcos, travel service providers and a long list of other service providers and, especially combined with a growing domestic tenant market, this is stimulating demand for high quality office space. On the other hand, current developers are concerned that ongoing restrictions on foreign ownership of retail establishments, which is limited beyond the first establishment by an "Economic Needs Test", will hinder demand for the many retail complexes currently in the approval and implementation process.

Contributed by: Fred Burke, Managing Partner, Baker & McKenzie LLP, Vietnam




Advertisement    
 
     
China
Circular on the Promotion of Efficient and Concentrated Land Use

The incredible growth and prosperity of the People's Republic of China (PRC)'s economy has attracted enormous amounts of capital from both local and overseas investors. The side effect of this phenomenal growth is the danger of inflation. The PRC government has been trying to tackle this problem, particularly in relation to the over-heating of the property market.

Over the past 18 months, PRC ministries and regulators sought to tighten control over and cool down land grants and real estate development by issuing or increasing enforcement of a variety of regulations. The State Council (China's highest legislative authority after the National People's Congress) has recently weighed in to reinforce this message through its Circular on the Promotion of Efficient and Concentrated Land Use issued on 3 January 2008.

This circular re-emphasised the existing control measures and introduced new ones, covering a wide range of issues from the clean-up of idle land; efficient land planning and; real estate financing; to government performance reviews. Some of the more important changes are:

. Introduction of an additional land grant fee reflecting land value appreciation on the grant or transfer of idle land;
. Prohibition on financial institutions providing loans or pre-IPO financing of projects involving illegal land use with the implication that bank managers may be held personally liable for any breach;
. Setting up of a new index to reflect the relationship between consumption of construction land and changes in GDP and fixed asset investments as a benchmark for the performance of the government at all levels;
. Re-emphasising existing restrictions and measures such as the existing idle fee" of 20 percent; suspension of land supply for villa developments; and a ban on issuing land use rights certificate prior to the land grant fee being paid in full.

What impact these measures have on the PRC real estate market remains to be seen. The additional land grant fee for land appreciation, when combined with the existing idle land fee may significantly burden PRC developers and impact on the existing land reserve mechanism. The new index may also have a significant impact on the approach of local government approach towards real estate development since local authorities have in the past few years generally favoured real estate development in order to boost GDP growth.

Whilst it is unclear when and how these new measures will be implemented at the local level, this circular urges all provinces to report on their progress in the cleaning up of their idle land before June 2008 and it is expected local authorities will take initiatives to comply.

Contributed by: Real Estate Practice, Allen & Overy

China
Investment Regulations

Anyone taking an interest in the PRC property sector will be well aware that in recent times Government has become concerned about investment in real estate. Recently introduced Notices 171, 50 and 130 have resulted in new regulations and restrictions.

The basic position under the law is that any foreign-invested property project should be established based on the approval of the National Development Reform Committee and Ministry of Commerce. The correct approach as required by law is for a foreign investor to participate in a property project through the formation of a special property owning joint venture or wholly foreign owned enterprise (WFOE).

Foreign investors have responded by using a variety of investment structures, some of which have involved funds entering China through a chain of business entities (often based in secondary cities) which appear to be unconnected with the ultimate intended investment into domestic real estate projects.

Legal concerns
It is important for foreign investors to be aware of the risks that are often involved with structures that are not fully compliant. Notice 50 expressly prohibited any foreign investor from evading foreign investment examination and approval procedures by means of indirectly controlling a domestic real estate enterprise.

There could potentially be other complications resulting from the Regulations on Merger of Domestic Enterprises with Foreign Investors which was introduced in August 2006 and included provisions regarding the indirect investment by foreign investors in domestic enterprises without correct approvals.

Foreign exchange
The State Administration of Foreign Exchange ("SAFE") is now required to prevent the contribution of capital by foreign investors into property projects without Ministry of Commerce registration. In June 2007, SAFE penalised 29 banks and financial institutions (some of them foreign) for illegal activity in various transactions including a number involving real estate deals.

It needs to be remembered that in its commitment to the World Trade Organization China has agreed to permit foreign investment in the property sector. Further regulation cannot however, be ruled out although it is necessary to adapt to change and to react to restrictions imposed by government, careful risk analysis and legal advice is important.

Contributed by: Ian Lewis, Partner, Mayer Brown JSM


Contributed by:
Barbara Li, Associate, Baker & McKenzie.

This is an edited version of an article which originally appeared in Baker & McKenzie's PRC / Vietnam Projects & Construction Newsletter.
   
ISSN 1994-9464
Key title: RFP magazine
Abbreviated key title: RFP mag.


Search the web
  Print Edition

NOMINATE NOW

Subscribe Now

Sign Up for Ezine

Past Issues