|
|
REAL ESTATE
Contact
the editor |
Print this article |
Email this article |
| |
|
|
|
Landlord Fairy Tales:
Reinstatement Rubbish
Issue 45 - September 08
As companies become more aware of their environmental footprint tenants are beginning
to question the wastage associated with end-of-lease reinstatement (as opposed to just
the cost). With a little help from Snow White we get to the bottom of who needs to change their
behaviour: turns out it's everyone.
While technically the last in this series of Landlord
Fairy Tales it is unlikely that they will disappear for good. Some situations or problems are recurring themes
that try as we might, never get solved. This month's topic is a case in point. Absolutely no-one is willing to
take responsibility, even partially, for a practice that everyone agrees is "terribly wasteful". It also brought
up a possible name change, the next fairy tales might well focus on real estate agents, building managers,
office tenants or any of the other groups of people supposedly responsible. Its not surprising that no-one
acts as there are so many other people to point the finger at, seven of them in fact.
As companies become more aware of their environmental footprint tenants are beginning to question the wastage associated with endof-
lease reinstatement (as opposed to just the cost). With a little help from Snow White we get to the bottom of who needs to change their
behaviour: turns out it's everyone.
Interior designers, contractors, product suppliers, lease drafters, government, building managers and tenants -
that's seven. Who are alternately grumpy, happy, dopey, lazy...is this reminding anyone of a story they've heard
before? Traditionally the story of Snow White is about a perfectly formed young woman, everyone's ideal, who
is cast out by the new incoming Queen who has decided the girl is cramping her style. A hunter commissioned
to 'fix' the problem tricks the Queen into believing Snow White is out of the picture. Meanwhile Snow White has
come across a group of dwarves and is paying her way by keeping house for them. The Queen finds out about it
and takes it upon herself to get rid of the girl for real.
Finally she is successful but a dashing Prince comes along and dislodges the bit of
apple that choked Snow White. Good as new, the two are married. Several parts of
this tale can help us understand how to stop wastage (and cost!) on interior fitouts of
retail and office space.
The problem
The reinstatement problem really varies depending on who is complaining about it.
Some people even seem baffled that there is any sort of problem at all. So let's start
with a more general overview. The construction industry creates up to a third of all
landfill. It is notoriously and unashamedly wasteful, and this applies as much to interior
contracting as to larger scale projects. That each floor of every grade A building is
gutted and then refitted every time a new tenant begins their lease (as often as every
three years) is a shocking generator of landfill waste.
The second problem, cost, is really only a problem for the tenants. The need to recoup,
reduce or avoid reinstatement costs at the end of each lease is a battle region-wide.
Tenants see themselves as "poor Snow White, cast out, a victim of the system. That
horrid hunter (read 'cowboy of a real estate agent') could have got me out of this better
but now I'm sitting here putting dinner on the table for a bunch of forest dwellers."
Even better, in the original story instead of seven dwarves, Snow White was paying
her keep to seven robbers.
The blame game
No one group has caused either of these problems, yet everyone is living with the
consequences of their own actions. All seem to feel like they can't do anything to
change the situation. Generally however two groups are blamed for problem one:
landlords and tenants. Most people interviewed for this article said that tenants
prefer to move into bear shell or 'original condition' space so they want complete
reinstatement. Yet Jeremy Kwok, Regional Real Estate Director, WPP, parent company
of numerous media groups with multiple leases all over the region is pretty clear, "that
is not what tenants want".
Most tenants would agree. Tenants reinstate because that is what they are required
to do in their lease, says Kwok. At termination, the argument generally turns to what
needs to be reinstated or replaced. He says that generally this clause is enforced
because the new tenants will not want to take possession and deal with parts of the
fit-out that they don't want themselves.
Alfred Lo, Business Development, Hysan, proposes a solution that Hysan already adopt
with certain tenants. Instead of requiring the tenant to reinstate, they take the funds
required from the tenant and if a new tenant is willing to take the space "as-is" they
refund the sum to the departing tenant. People who benefit from this scenario are:
. the landlord (its often swifter and there is little risk on their part),
. the departing and new tenant (cheaper, quicker and less trouble) and
. neighbours (saved from the disruption of reinstatement)
Contractors, product suppliers and designers may also benefit. Lo says it isn't unusual
for organisations to accept only some parts of the space. It can get messy. For
example new tenants might replace the wallpaper but keep the carpet. However, the
need for replacement usually comes not through wear but because the space is not suitable for this company's requirements. Things that
are relatively standard in a certain type of company, such as server rooms, are likely to remain in place. The interior
design consultant plays an important advisory role as to what should stay and what should go he says.
|
|
| Advertisement |
|
|
 |
|
| |
|
|
|
PhiPhillip Marchione of design firm SLA's Malaysia office says
that the practice of reinstatement in higher grade buildings
is standard regionally though it can be negotiated in some
cases. This is more likely when exiting tenants find the
new tenants themselves, or if the land lord knows of a
specific tenant who wants an existing fit out.
The process can get complicated, with Kwok suggesting
that tenants take their own "before and after" photos
of the space and get their own line item quotes from
subcontractors, as landlord nominated subcontractors will
invariably charge more. The landlords prefer to use their
own as they know the building better. Usually nominated
subcontractors for fire services and HVAC (though not
always electrical services) are stated in the fit out
guidelines in the lease, says a representative from design
firm PMCA. As agents of the landlord, the nominated
contractors will often not discuss their quote with the
exiting, incoming tenants or their designers.
As Teri Liew, Keppel Land, landlord of several grade A
buildings, points out; there is no relationship between
the exiting and the new tenant. The landlord owns the
building, they want it to continue to be attractive and of
a consistent quality for incoming tenants so they require
demolition and reinstatement.
Even in Kwok and Lo's "ideal scenario" where the landlord
holds the money until the next tenant has decided what
parts of the existing fit out they want to keep, things can
go wrong. Having been given money everyone knows that
landlords have a propensity to hang on to it for as long as
possible and some unscrupulous ones don't bother giving
the money back regardless. This practice does not help
those smaller more flexible landlords who are actually
trying to give their clients better service. Again it comes
down to communication. This is where the dwarves come
in.
The other snow white or no more martyrs
Another way of looking at the story through the looking
glass of a fairytale might be to view the fit-out itself as
Snow White, who rather than looking for a new home
is actually looking for a new tenant. In this scenario you
could see the dwarves and the hunter (that is all parties
in the industry including regulators, designers, real estate
agents) as people whose job it is to help her through the
transition. Who knows the forest better? Rather than
sitting around accepting the status quo why not suggest
other companies that could take the space, encourage the
communication. There is a tenant out there for any existing
space.
Instead of leaving behind a great mess in its wake, a
tenant could prepare in advance for reinstatement. There
is no reason why everyone in the process cant help with
this. Tenant's contractors work closely with the designers
and, says CY Chan, Project Manager Sonic (China) Ltd,
many materials can be reused. He believes that the
amount of materials kept and the amount demolished and
sent to landfill solely depend on the decision of the client/
tenant. His government client use reusable partitions, so
walls do not need to be demolished. Product suppliers
such as Clestra are stepping up with green (not to mention
cost-effective) solutions that can be re-used and/or
recycled.
So rather than shaking your head an blaming everyone
else take action to find ways to find the fit-out equivalent
of a Snow White, and rather than allowing her to be badly
treated and replaced why not design and keep her ready
for when the next prince moves in. RFP
The reinstatement "Save Snow White" campaign!
Your office may have been through a rough time, but you can still be the prince
that saves the day!
. Be a part of the new tenant search process.
. Tell your landlord that you are willing to work with the new tenant.
. Listen to the designer at fit-out so that you can save later on reinstatement
. Use reusable partitions, furniture, lighting, carpet
. Protect windows, especially in older buildings that scratch easily
. Use recyclable products and make sure they are recycled
. Require that nominated subcontractors are environmentally certified and are
committed to recycling
.
|
|
| |
|
ISSN 1994-9464
Key title: RFP magazine
Abbreviated key title: RFP mag.
|
|